Scientists from the National Graphene Institute at The University of Manchester demonstrated that superconductivity in magic-angle graphene can be completely switched off by screening interactions between electrons. [1]
Professor Alexey Berdyugin from the National University of Singapore said that when the screening was switched on, superconductivity was completely suppressed, providing clear experimental evidence that the phenomenon originates from strong electron-electron interactions. [2] The researchers observed that increasing the carrier density in the neighboring graphene bilayer progressively weakened superconductivity in the adjacent magic-angle graphene until it was completely suppressed. [3] The team compared experimental results with theoretical modeling and found that conventional phonon-mediated superconductivity would be expected to remain largely unchanged or increase slightly when Coulomb interactions are screened, contrary to the observed opposite behavior. [4]
The team built a device containing two twisted graphene bilayers separated by less than a nanometre, allowing one layer to act as a tunable screening layer for the other. [5]Científicos del Instituto Nacional de Grafeno de la Universidad de Mánchester demostraron que la superconductividad en el grafeno de ángulo mágico puede desactivarse por completo al apantallar las interacciones entre electrones. [1]
El profesor Alexey Berdyugin, de la Universidad Nacional de Singapur, afirmó que cuando se activó el apantallamiento, la superconductividad se suprimió por completo, lo que proporciona evidencia experimental clara de que el fenómeno se origina en fuertes interacciones electrón-electrón. [2] Los investigadores observaron que aumentar la densidad de portadores en la bicapa de grafeno vecina debilitaba progresivamente la superconductividad en el grafeno de ángulo mágico adyacente hasta suprimirla por completo. [3] El equipo comparó los resultados experimentales con modelos teóricos y encontró que la superconductividad convencional mediada por fonones debería permanecer prácticamente sin cambios o aumentar ligeramente cuando se apantallan las interacciones de Coulomb, contrario al comportamiento opuesto observado. [4]
El equipo construyó un dispositivo que contenía dos bicapas de grafeno torcidas separadas por menos de un nanómetro, lo que permitía que una capa actuara como capa de apantallamiento ajustable para la otra. [5]
Proof5 sources · 2 publishers
What this stands on
Scientists from the National Graphene Institute at The University of Manchester demonstrated that superconductivity in magic-angle graphene can be completely switched off by screening interactions between electrons. · Phys.org
Professor Alexey Berdyugin from the National University of Singapore said that when the screening was switched on, superconductivity was completely suppressed, providing clear experimental evidence that the phenomenon originates from strong electron-electron interactions. · Phys.org
The researchers observed that increasing the carrier density in the neighboring graphene bilayer progressively weakened superconductivity in the adjacent magic-angle graphene until it was completely suppressed. · Phys.org
The team compared experimental results with theoretical modeling and found that conventional phonon-mediated superconductivity would be expected to remain largely unchanged or increase slightly when Coulomb interactions are screened, contrary to the observed opposite behavior. · Phys.org
The team built a device containing two twisted graphene bilayers separated by less than a nanometre, allowing one layer to act as a tunable screening layer for the other. · Interesting Engineering
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Saturday, September 5, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world2 publishers reported the events across 2 source articles
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
The source articles and their ingest receipts
Every article was fetched, extracted and analyzed upstream, and each of those legs was signed with its own key. This opens the record's own receipts for them.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-05T06:24Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.