{
  "story_id": "560b1a0723085a5ed336a8ef0a849537",
  "desk": "drm3",
  "revision": 1,
  "published_at": "2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z",
  "content_hash": "e9cd0e2c057cafcdc0c2f82dc147350011ea83467297c3366755a94fbddf6191",
  "hash_basis": "sha256 over `headline\\ndek\\nprose`, plus `\\n` + the canonical citations JSON when any source is placed, plus `\\n#blog` for blogs",
  "basis": {
    "headline": "Mexico Workers Can Refuse Bag Searches Without Registered Company Rules",
    "dek": "Under Mexican labor law, employees may legally refuse bag inspections if the company lacks a registered internal regulation.",
    "prose": "For a bag inspection to be legal and mandatory, the company must detail the protocol in its Internal Work Regulation (Reglamento Interior de Trabajo). [^1]\n\nIf an employer conducts bag inspections without a federally registered regulation, the procedure is considered illegal, and the worker has the legitimate right to refuse the inspection. [^2]\n\nThe Federal Labor Law (LFT) in Mexico does not explicitly prohibit bag and personal item inspections but requires companies to follow a strict legal procedure to protect worker privacy and dignity. [^3]\n\nThe Internal Work Regulation must be officially deposited with the Federal Conciliation and Labor Registry Center (CFCRL) to have legal validity. [^4]\n\nThe Mexican Federal Labor Law (LFT) does not explicitly prohibit or regulate searches of workers' belongings at work, according to Fernando Martínez Flores, partner at Jauregui del Valle law firm. [^5]\n\nEvidence obtained through invasive searches or violations of fundamental rights is considered 'illicit proof' and holds no value in labor courts, potentially turning a dismissal for theft into an unjustified dismissal. [^6]\n\nThe Inter-American Court of Human Rights established that searches cannot exceed a superficial pat-down of a person's clothing and must not be invasive or corporal. [^7]",
    "cited": "[{\"statement\":\"For a bag inspection to be legal and mandatory, the company must detail the protocol in its Internal Work Regulation (Reglamento Interior de Trabajo).\",\"source\":\"El Imparcial\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Imparcial\"]},{\"statement\":\"If an employer conducts bag inspections without a federally registered regulation, the procedure is considered illegal, and the worker has the legitimate right to refuse the inspection.\",\"source\":\"El Imparcial\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Imparcial\"]},{\"statement\":\"The Federal Labor Law (LFT) in Mexico does not explicitly prohibit bag and personal item inspections but requires companies to follow a strict legal procedure to protect worker privacy and dignity.\",\"source\":\"El Imparcial\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Imparcial\"]},{\"statement\":\"The Internal Work Regulation must be officially deposited with the Federal Conciliation and Labor Registry Center (CFCRL) to have legal validity.\",\"source\":\"El Imparcial\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Imparcial\"]},{\"statement\":\"The Mexican Federal Labor Law (LFT) does not explicitly prohibit or regulate searches of workers' belongings at work, according to Fernando Martínez Flores, partner at Jauregui del Valle law firm.\",\"source\":\"El Economista\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-02T14:05:00.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Economista\"]},{\"statement\":\"Evidence obtained through invasive searches or violations of fundamental rights is considered 'illicit proof' and holds no value in labor courts, potentially turning a dismissal for theft into an unjustified dismissal.\",\"source\":\"El Economista\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-02T14:05:00.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Economista\"]},{\"statement\":\"The Inter-American Court of Human Rights established that searches cannot exceed a superficial pat-down of a person's clothing and must not be invasive or corporal.\",\"source\":\"El Economista\",\"instrument\":\"News\",\"claim_key\":null,\"published_at\":\"2026-09-02T14:05:00.000Z\",\"publisher_count\":1,\"sources\":[\"El Economista\"]}]",
    "kind": "news"
  },
  "receipt_verify": "Ed25519 over the dot-joined string `slice_hash.cursor_from.cursor_to.view.view_version.row_count`; public_key and sig are base64url of the raw 32-byte key / 64-byte signature",
  "receipt": null,
  "receipt_note": "this revision predates receipt-keeping (before v0.37.0); the filed row lives in the record",
  "generation_chain": {
    "wire": {
      "stream": "fountain_news",
      "story_id": "25c0fb91773c65ed489274ea39f87894",
      "thread_id": "454912e4b579afea5706d510f4270166",
      "thread_label": "Centro Federal de Conciliación y Registro Laboral",
      "novelty": "UPDATE",
      "content_hash": "c58e20f1b56b9ef10599b733a5a6482c7642a9f5029f21c203f4ec92aa1f8bcb",
      "last_published_at": "2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z",
      "read_receipt": {
        "slice_hash": "1422156713b8cd59725535e37e38ef77783f4374686d834438207c1942764f31",
        "cursor_from": "eyJ0cyI6IjIwMjYtMDktMDNUMjI6MjQ6MjQuMDAwMDAwWiIsImlkIjoiMmIwMjcwOGU1MDJhYjFjYWJhZmI3MzlmMTViZDc0MTQiLCJ2IjoiMSJ9",
        "cursor_to": "eyJ0cyI6IjIwMjYtMDktMDNUMjM6MDA6MDguMDAwMDAwWiIsImlkIjoiODhmZjU3M2MzYmNkZTQzMzc5ZTBlZmExMWQzZTc5OTciLCJ2IjoiMSJ9",
        "view": "v_fountain_news",
        "view_version": "1",
        "row_count": 100,
        "window_days": 3,
        "bytes_scanned": 12166856,
        "credits": 8,
        "price_per_100_rows": 8,
        "sig": "NGlp97IYsTU_yLWU3eUO9RAexi9nFDHg1wMDlTR6edydyzqFT-MNZE28iouGwqK-gvsE3qrw0HzaY3hsqe27Cg",
        "public_key": "bMUigy8O0jOnBxQ4Sc-5lwhIZ8LQVAhxMbR7qESVuUE",
        "signer_path": "lakehouse/data-extract/v1",
        "alg": "Ed25519",
        "signed": true
      }
    },
    "written_at": "2026-09-04T06:50:50.990Z"
  },
  "cited_facts": [
    {
      "statement": "For a bag inspection to be legal and mandatory, the company must detail the protocol in its Internal Work Regulation (Reglamento Interior de Trabajo).",
      "source": "El Imparcial",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Imparcial"
      ]
    },
    {
      "statement": "If an employer conducts bag inspections without a federally registered regulation, the procedure is considered illegal, and the worker has the legitimate right to refuse the inspection.",
      "source": "El Imparcial",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Imparcial"
      ]
    },
    {
      "statement": "The Federal Labor Law (LFT) in Mexico does not explicitly prohibit bag and personal item inspections but requires companies to follow a strict legal procedure to protect worker privacy and dignity.",
      "source": "El Imparcial",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Imparcial"
      ]
    },
    {
      "statement": "The Internal Work Regulation must be officially deposited with the Federal Conciliation and Labor Registry Center (CFCRL) to have legal validity.",
      "source": "El Imparcial",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-03T22:59:59.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Imparcial"
      ]
    },
    {
      "statement": "The Mexican Federal Labor Law (LFT) does not explicitly prohibit or regulate searches of workers' belongings at work, according to Fernando Martínez Flores, partner at Jauregui del Valle law firm.",
      "source": "El Economista",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-02T14:05:00.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Economista"
      ]
    },
    {
      "statement": "Evidence obtained through invasive searches or violations of fundamental rights is considered 'illicit proof' and holds no value in labor courts, potentially turning a dismissal for theft into an unjustified dismissal.",
      "source": "El Economista",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-02T14:05:00.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Economista"
      ]
    },
    {
      "statement": "The Inter-American Court of Human Rights established that searches cannot exceed a superficial pat-down of a person's clothing and must not be invasive or corporal.",
      "source": "El Economista",
      "instrument": "News",
      "claim_key": null,
      "published_at": "2026-09-02T14:05:00.000Z",
      "publisher_count": 1,
      "sources": [
        "El Economista"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "note": "A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true."
}