Colombia's gross fixed capital formation as a percentage of GDP has fallen to 16%, the lowest level since 1992 (excluding pandemic years), which is insufficient to replace asset depreciation. ^[1] Several legislative projects have been proposed in Colombia to dismantle the healthy taxes created in 2022, including proposals to eliminate taxes on sugary drinks, ultra-processed foods, or both. ^[2] Fiscal indiscipline and excessive debt during the previous government pushed interest rates to levels higher than the profitability of most projects. ^[3] Jorge Restrepo identified three fundamental blows from the previous government that increased the cost of production and capital usage, discouraging investment. ^[4] Jorge Restrepo, an economics professor at Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, stated that the low investment rate makes it impossible to replace natural infrastructure wear and tear or expand the economy to improve household welfare. ^[5] A study using the Integrated Household Survey found no generalized and statistically significant reductions in employment or labor income in sectors most exposed to the taxes and labeling. ^[6] Experts argue that the proposals rely on incomplete evidence and that the best course of action is not to eliminate the taxes. ^[7] Paul Rodríguez Lesmes, Luis Fernando Gómez, Mercedes Mora, and Mayra Saenz authored an analysis stating that the taxes were not designed primarily to finance the state but to change relative prices and consumer decisions. ^[8]