Raul Asencio was subjected to a routine sobriety check on Gran Canaria in mid-August, which revealed a blood alcohol level of 0.90 mg per liter of exhaled breath, equivalent to approximately 1.9 promille. [1]
Three days after the test, Raul Asencio was convicted of a crime against road safety and sentenced to an eight-month ban on driving vehicles. [2]
On September 3, 2026, the Las Palmas Court of Instance sentenced Real Madrid footballers Ferrán Ruiz, Juan Rodríguez, and Andrés García to one year of suspended prison time for child pornography. [3]
Real Madrid coach Jose Mourinho confirmed that the club has opened a disciplinary file against defender Raul Asencio. [4]
A court on the Spanish island of Gran Canaria said on Thursday that Real Madrid defender Raul Asencio has been cleared of charges related to sharing a sexually explicit video without the consent of the victims, including a minor. [5]
The trial for the leak of intimate videos involving Real Madrid defender Raul Asencio began on September 3, 2026, in Las Palmas. [6]
The two victims involved in the case formally forgave Asencio during the proceedings. [7]
Real Madrid initiated its own disciplinary proceedings against Raul Asencio following the conviction. [8]
The court also imposed a fine of 14,400 euros on Raul Asencio for the traffic offense. [9]
Defender Raül Asencio was acquitted and released freely after the prosecutor withdrew all charges against him. [10]
The three convicted players received two years of distance from the victims and three years of professional disqualification for exercising professions related to minors. [11]
The victims confirmed to the judge on September 3, 2026, that they forgave all four men involved in the case. [12]
What this stands on
Raul Asencio was subjected to a routine sobriety check on Gran Canaria in mid-August, which revealed a blood alcohol level of 0.90 mg per liter of exhaled breath, equivalent to approximately 1.9 promille. · Przegląd Sportowy
Three days after the test, Raul Asencio was convicted of a crime against road safety and sentenced to an eight-month ban on driving vehicles. · Przegląd Sportowy
On September 3, 2026, the Las Palmas Court of Instance sentenced Real Madrid footballers Ferrán Ruiz, Juan Rodríguez, and Andrés García to one year of suspended prison time for child pornography. · El Mundo
Real Madrid coach Jose Mourinho confirmed that the club has opened a disciplinary file against defender Raul Asencio. · Excélsior
A court on the Spanish island of Gran Canaria said on Thursday that Real Madrid defender Raul Asencio has been cleared of charges related to sharing a sexually explicit video without the consent of the victims, including a minor. · Al Jazeera
The trial for the leak of intimate videos involving Real Madrid defender Raul Asencio began on September 3, 2026, in Las Palmas. · Yahoo! Sports
The two victims involved in the case formally forgave Asencio during the proceedings. · Yahoo! Sports
Real Madrid initiated its own disciplinary proceedings against Raul Asencio following the conviction. · Przegląd Sportowy
The court also imposed a fine of 14,400 euros on Raul Asencio for the traffic offense. · Przegląd Sportowy
Defender Raül Asencio was acquitted and released freely after the prosecutor withdrew all charges against him. · El Mundo
The three convicted players received two years of distance from the victims and three years of professional disqualification for exercising professions related to minors. · El Mundo
The victims confirmed to the judge on September 3, 2026, that they forgave all four men involved in the case. · El Mundo
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
Article provenance · 12 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Friday, September 4, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world5 publishers reported the events
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-04T12:26Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.
Analytics cookies? This paper would like to use Google Analytics to see which pages are useful. It sets cookies and shares usage data with Google. Nothing loads unless you accept, and you can change your mind any time under Cookie settings in the footer. Privacy