Emil Michael, the top Pentagon official overseeing military artificial intelligence policy, sold his holdings in AI-powered search engine company Perplexity in June 2026 for between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal financial records seen by the Guardian. [1][2][5][7]
U.S. District Judge Rita Lin ruled in 2026 that the Pentagon's blacklist of Anthropic illegally retaliated against the company for refusing to let its models be used for mass surveillance and autonomous lethal operations, vacating the designation and issuing a permanent injunction. [3] Ethics expert Richard Painter, a former White House lawyer under George W. Bush, said Michael should have sold all interest in Perplexity before starting his job, and that most administrations would have required that. [4] Michael received a personal loan from Perplexity in 2024 of between $250,000 and $500,000 at a 4.57% interest rate, and joined the company's advisory board, from which he stepped down when entering federal service, according to his financial disclosure filings. [6]
U.S. President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's technology on 2026-02-27, and the Pentagon subsequently branded the company a 'supply chain risk', barring military contractors from doing business with it. [8]Emil Michael, el principal funcionario del Pentágono a cargo de la política de inteligencia artificial militar, vendió sus participaciones en la empresa de motores de búsqueda impulsados por IA Perplexity en junio de 2026 por entre $5 millones y $25 millones, según registros financieros federales vistos por The Guardian. [1][2][5][7]
La jueza de distrito de EE. UU. Rita Lin dictaminó en 2026 que la lista negra del Pentágono contra Anthropic retalió ilegalmente contra la empresa por negarse a permitir que sus modelos se usaran para vigilancia masiva y operaciones letales autónomas, anulando la designación y emitiendo una orden judicial permanente. [3] El experto en ética Richard Painter, ex abogado de la Casa Blanca bajo George W. Bush, dijo que Michael debería haber vendido todo su interés en Perplexity antes de comenzar su trabajo, y que la mayoría de las administraciones lo habrían exigido. [4] Michael recibió un préstamo personal de Perplexity en 2024 de entre $250,000 y $500,000 a una tasa de interés del 4.57%, y se unió al consejo asesor de la empresa, del cual renunció al ingresar al servicio federal, según sus declaraciones de divulgación financiera. [6]
El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, ordenó a las agencias federales dejar de usar la tecnología de Anthropic el 2026-02-27, y el Pentágono posteriormente calificó a la empresa como un 'riesgo de cadena de suministro', prohibiendo a los contratistas militares hacer negocios con ella. [8]
Proof8 sources · 2 publishers
What this stands on
Emil Michael, the top Pentagon official overseeing military artificial intelligence policy, sold his holdings in AI-powered search engine company Perplexity in June 2026 for between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal financial records seen by the Guardian. · The Guardian
Emil Michael, the Pentagon's undersecretary of defense for research and engineering and chief technology officer, sold his stake in Perplexity AI in June 2026 for between $5 million and $25 million, according to financial disclosures reviewed by The Guardian. · Decrypt
U.S. District Judge Rita Lin ruled in 2026 that the Pentagon's blacklist of Anthropic illegally retaliated against the company for refusing to let its models be used for mass surveillance and autonomous lethal operations, vacating the designation and issuing a permanent injunction. · Decrypt
Ethics expert Richard Painter, a former White House lawyer under George W. Bush, said Michael should have sold all interest in Perplexity before starting his job, and that most administrations would have required that. · The Guardian
In January 2026, Emil Michael sold his private investment in Elon Musk's AI company xAI, reaping gains of between 400% and 4,800% and profits of up to $24 million, according to federal financial disclosures previously reported by the Guardian. · The Guardian
Michael received a personal loan from Perplexity in 2024 of between $250,000 and $500,000 at a 4.57% interest rate, and joined the company's advisory board, from which he stepped down when entering federal service, according to his financial disclosure filings. · The Guardian
Michael also sold his stake in Elon Musk's xAI on 2026-01-09 for between $5 million and $25 million, a gain of up to 4,800% compared with the $500,000 to $1 million value reported when he entered government, according to IBTimes UK. · Decrypt
U.S. President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's technology on 2026-02-27, and the Pentagon subsequently branded the company a 'supply chain risk', barring military contractors from doing business with it. · Decrypt
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Wednesday, September 2, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world2 publishers reported the events across 2 source articles
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
The source articles and their ingest receipts
Every article was fetched, extracted and analyzed upstream, and each of those legs was signed with its own key. This opens the record's own receipts for them.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-03T00:46Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.