As of 2026-09-03 19:40 UTC.Market figures are as the cited sources reported them at that time and may have moved since. This is news, not investment advice.
The US Department of Justice announced on September 2, 2026, that the FBI seized more than $560,000 in cryptocurrency donations intended for Hamas. [1]
Jeanine Pirro, the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, stated that Hamas's networks are not secure and their cryptocurrencies are vulnerable. [2] The US Department of Justice indicated that it took control of website domains and communication platforms used by Hamas for fundraising and recruitment. [3] Blockchain analytics played a central role in tracing the flow of funds across multiple wallets, exchanges, and cross-chain bridges during the investigation. [4]
The initial investigation began in March 2025, when authorities traced $200,000 in stablecoin donations to wallets controlled by Hamas' military wing, the al-Qassam Brigades. [5] Hamas solicited donations through its Telegram channel and utilized direct internet fundraising methods. [6] By mid-2026, authorities had expanded their efforts to include domain and server seizures, effectively intercepting additional donations and dismantling communication channels. [7]El Departamento de Justicia de US anunció el 2 de septiembre de 2026 que el FBI incautó más de $560,000 en donaciones de criptomonedas destinadas a Hamas. [1]
Jeanine Pirro, la fiscal de US para el Distrito de Columbia, declaró que las redes de Hamas no son seguras y que sus criptomonedas son vulnerables. [2]
El Departamento de Justicia de US indicó que tomó control de los dominios de sitios web y plataformas de comunicación utilizados por Hamas para recaudar fondos y reclutar. [3]
El análisis de blockchain desempeñó un papel central en el rastreo del flujo de fondos a través de múltiples billeteras, intercambios y puentes entre cadenas durante la investigación. [4]
La investigación inicial comenzó en marzo de 2025, cuando las autoridades rastrearon $200,000 en donaciones de monedas estables hasta billeteras controladas por el ala militar de Hamas, las Brigadas al-Qassam. [5]
Hamas solicitó donaciones a través de su canal de Telegram y utilizó métodos directos de recaudación de fondos por internet. [6]
Para mediados de 2026, las autoridades habían ampliado sus esfuerzos para incluir incautaciones de dominios y servidores, interceptando efectivamente donaciones adicionales y desmantelando canales de comunicación. [7]
Proof7 sources · 2 publishers
What this stands on
The US Department of Justice announced on September 2, 2026, that the FBI seized more than $560,000 in cryptocurrency donations intended for Hamas. · Primera HoraPuerto Rico
Jeanine Pirro, the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, stated that Hamas's networks are not secure and their cryptocurrencies are vulnerable. · Primera HoraPuerto Rico
The US Department of Justice indicated that it took control of website domains and communication platforms used by Hamas for fundraising and recruitment. · Primera HoraPuerto Rico
Blockchain analytics played a central role in tracing the flow of funds across multiple wallets, exchanges, and cross-chain bridges during the investigation. · Blockchain.News
The initial investigation began in March 2025, when authorities traced $200,000 in stablecoin donations to wallets controlled by Hamas' military wing, the al-Qassam Brigades. · Blockchain.News
Hamas solicited donations through its Telegram channel and utilized direct internet fundraising methods. · Primera HoraPuerto Rico
By mid-2026, authorities had expanded their efforts to include domain and server seizures, effectively intercepting additional donations and dismantling communication channels. · Blockchain.News
The one we could place publishes from Puerto Rico. 1 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Thursday, September 3, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world2 publishers reported the events across 2 source articles
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
The one we could place publishes from Puerto Rico. 1 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
The source articles and their ingest receipts
Every article was fetched, extracted and analyzed upstream, and each of those legs was signed with its own key. This opens the record's own receipts for them.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-04T06:39Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.