£1 Car Boot Find Revealed as 600-Year-Old Ming Dynasty Jade Dog

A jade dog bought for £1 at a UK car boot sale is valued at up to £10,000 as a Ming dynasty treasure.

TruthFoundry Desk

from the fact record

Stands on 8 placed sources from 2 publishers.

A Chinese jade dog purchased for £1 at a car boot sale in the UK has been identified as a 600-year-old artifact. ^[1] A collector bought a rare Chinese jade dog figurine for one pound at a flea market around noon. ^[2] The jade dog figurine sold for 10,000 pounds at the auction. ^[3] Auctioneer Charles Hanson of Hansons Auctioneers in Etwall, Derbyshire, stated that the piece is an archaic seated recumbent dog carved from black and green jade. ^[4] The jade dog is 8.5cm long, carved from mottled black and green jade, and depicts a seated recumbent dog with its head turned backwards. ^[5] The jade dog is expected to fetch up to £10,000 at auction. ^[6] Experts estimate the figurine was created between 1380 and 1420 during the Ming Dynasty. ^[7] The figurine was offered for sale at Hansons Auctioneers in Derbyshire two months after the purchase. ^[8]

What this stands on

A Chinese jade dog purchased for £1 at a car boot sale in the UK has been identified as a 600-year-old artifact. · The Times Of India

A collector bought a rare Chinese jade dog figurine for one pound at a flea market around noon. ·

Blic.rs

The jade dog figurine sold for 10,000 pounds at the auction. ·

Blic.rs

Auctioneer Charles Hanson of Hansons Auctioneers in Etwall, Derbyshire, stated that the piece is an archaic seated recumbent dog carved from black and green jade. · The Times Of India

The jade dog is 8.5cm long, carved from mottled black and green jade, and depicts a seated recumbent dog with its head turned backwards. · The Times Of India

The jade dog is expected to fetch up to £10,000 at auction. · The Times Of India

Experts estimate the figurine was created between 1380 and 1420 during the Ming Dynasty. ·

Blic.rs

The figurine was offered for sale at Hansons Auctioneers in Derbyshire two months after the purchase. ·

Blic.rs

We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.

Article provenance · 8 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling

How this piece was made: written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona, at the working desk on Wednesday, September 2, 2026. Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.

1 · The world2 publishers reported the events

What they stated is the numbered source list above.

Why these sources, and not others

How the desk chose them

We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.

Where they publish from

We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.

2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows

AI · semantic search

The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.

This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read. The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.

3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model

AI · news generation

The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-03T00:36Z.

The prompts, verbatim

System instruction (the grounding rules)

The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts

4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record

Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.

Integrity

Content hash (SHA-256)834bd8a395bb3d8686313956d3bdd5f985cd4e6edac399ca344f47ce7cda2b6a

Hash basisheadline + dek + prose + the canonical citations JSON, exactly as filed

Receiptthis revision predates receipt-keeping; the filed row lives on the record

Machine readablethe full proof, JSON

Verify

A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.