Aryna Sabalenka, the world No.1, complained to umpire Eva Asderaki-Moore about a strong cannabis smell during her third-round US Open match against Kamilla Rakhimova on Louis Armstrong Stadium. [1]
During Naomi Osaka's first-round match at the 2026 US Open, a spectator used a bright ring light to take pictures, and a group of fans in a suite recorded themselves animatedly, causing disruption. [2][3] Sabalenka said she asked fans not to smoke near the courts, saying it was tricky to handle the smell while competing. [4] USTA spokesman Brendan McIntyre said the facility is maintained as a smoke-free environment. [5]
Spectators were allegedly using portable lights, such as ring lights, to capture photos during the live matchplay. [6] Sabalenka stated she had never smelled the odor so strong as she did while serving early in the match against Kamilla Rakhimova. [7] Sabalenka told the umpire that she hopes officials will be more aware of marijuana use around the tennis courts. [8]
During the US Open, influencers with ring lights in a suite disrupted the match between Naomi Osaka and Anastasia Zakharova to the extent that the tournament posted a sign asking attendees to refrain from flash photography or other lighting. [9] Some influencers are paid six figures to create content covering the US Open, transforming the tournament into a high-payout content hub. [10] The article states that tennis enthusiasts continue to attend the US Open in droves, undeterred by the influencer incidents. [11]
US Open spokesperson Brendan McIntyre said the tournament is excited to see new fans attending but reminded them not to interfere with the action and competition on the court. [12]Aryna Sabalenka, la número uno del mundo, se quejó de un fuerte olor a cannabis ante la árbitra Eva Asderaki-Moore durante su partido de tercera ronda del US Open contra Kamilla Rakhimova en el estadio Louis Armstrong. [1]
Durante el partido de primera ronda de Naomi Osaka en el US Open de 2026, un espectador utilizó una luz anular brillante para tomar fotografías, y un grupo de fanáticos en un palco se grabó de manera animada, lo que provocó una interrupción. [2][3] Sabalenka dijo que pidió a los aficionados no fumar cerca de las canchas, y señaló que era difícil manejar el olor mientras competía. [4] El portavoz de la USTA, Brendan McIntyre, afirmó que el lugar se mantiene como un entorno libre de humo. [5]
Los espectadores presuntamente usaban luces portátiles, como luces anulares, para capturar fotos durante la acción en vivo. [6] Sabalenka declaró que nunca había notado un olor tan fuerte como cuando sacaba al inicio del partido contra Rakhimova. [7] Sabalenka dijo al árbitro que esperaba que los árbitros estuvieran más atentos al uso de marihuana en las cercanías de las canchas. [8]
Durante el US Open, los influencers con luces anulares en un palco interrumpieron el artista entre Naomi Osaka y Anastasia Zakharova, hasta que la federación publicó un cartel pidiendo a los presentes que se abstuvieran de usar flash o cualquier otra iluminación. [9] Algunos de ellos se pagan, se les paga seis cifras por generar contenido sobre el torneo, dejándolo como un foco de alto contenido de pago. [10] El artículo sostiene que los seguidores del tenis continúan acudiendo en masa al US Open sin dejarse por dichos incidentes. [11]
El vocero del US Open, Brendan McIntyre, declaró que el torneo se entus Sing alegre de ver nuevos fanáticos asistiendo, pero rico. Recordó que no de dejen interferir con la competencia en la cancha. [12]
Proof12 sources · 4 publishers
What this stands on
Aryna Sabalenka, the world No.1, complained to umpire Eva Asderaki-Moore about a strong cannabis smell during her third-round US Open match against Kamilla Rakhimova on Louis Armstrong Stadium. · Sky Sports
A chair umpire at the US Open chided a group of spectators in a hospitality suite for taking pictures and talking during a point in Naomi Osaka's match. · Daily Mail
During Naomi Osaka's first-round match at the 2026 US Open, a spectator used a bright ring light to take pictures, and a group of fans in a suite recorded themselves animatedly, causing disruption. · ESPN
Sabalenka said she asked fans not to smoke near the courts, saying it was tricky to handle the smell while competing. · Sky Sports
USTA spokesman Brendan McIntyre said the facility is maintained as a smoke-free environment. · Sky Sports
Spectators were allegedly using portable lights, such as ring lights, to capture photos during the live matchplay. · Daily Mail
Sabalenka stated she had never smelled the odor so strong as she did while serving early in the match against Kamilla Rakhimova. · ESPN
Sabalenka told the umpire that she hopes officials will be more aware of marijuana use around the tennis courts. · ESPN
During the US Open, influencers with ring lights in a suite disrupted the match between Naomi Osaka and Anastasia Zakharova to the extent that the tournament posted a sign asking attendees to refrain from flash photography or other lighting. · businessinsider.comUnited States
Some influencers are paid six figures to create content covering the US Open, transforming the tournament into a high-payout content hub. · businessinsider.comUnited States
The article states that tennis enthusiasts continue to attend the US Open in droves, undeterred by the influencer incidents. · businessinsider.comUnited States
US Open spokesperson Brendan McIntyre said the tournament is excited to see new fans attending but reminded them not to interfere with the action and competition on the court. · businessinsider.comUnited States
The one we could place publishes from United States. 3 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Saturday, September 5, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world4 publishers reported the events across 4 source articles
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
The one we could place publishes from United States. 3 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
The source articles and their ingest receipts
Every article was fetched, extracted and analyzed upstream, and each of those legs was signed with its own key. This opens the record's own receipts for them.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-05T12:32Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.