TruthFoundry News
Better tools. Better news.
Saturday, September 5, 2026 · UTC
284 of 1002 in this edition
AI

Seattle Times and Newsday Sue OpenAI and Microsoft Over AI Training

Two US newspapers filed a federal lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft alleging copyright infringement for AI training.

TruthFoundry Desk
from the fact record
Share on X
Stands on 6 placed sources from 2 publishers.
The Seattle Times and Newsday filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 4, alleging copyright infringement. [1] The plaintiffs allege that OpenAI and Microsoft scraped their websites, including content behind paywalls, to train AI products such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Bing's AI features. [2] The newspapers claim that the companies' AI products can reproduce passages from their reporting, closely paraphrase articles, and provide users with answers that reduce the need to visit their websites or buy subscriptions. [3] The Seattle Times and Newsday are seeking a court order requiring the destruction of copies of their works as well as training datasets or AI models incorporating them. [4] Seattle Times President and CEO Alan Fisco wrote to employees that the companies must defend their content, which they spend millions of dollars a year to produce, from being used without consent or compensation. [5] A spokesperson for Microsoft said in an email that while they are surprised by the lawsuit, they appreciate the importance of local journalism and are happy to explore solutions to the dispute. [6]
What this stands on
  1. The Seattle Times and Newsday filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 4, alleging copyright infringement. · Investing.com
  2. The plaintiffs allege that OpenAI and Microsoft scraped their websites, including content behind paywalls, to train AI products such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Bing's AI features. · Dawn
  3. The newspapers claim that the companies' AI products can reproduce passages from their reporting, closely paraphrase articles, and provide users with answers that reduce the need to visit their websites or buy subscriptions. · Investing.com
  4. The Seattle Times and Newsday are seeking a court order requiring the destruction of copies of their works as well as training datasets or AI models incorporating them. · Investing.com
  5. Seattle Times President and CEO Alan Fisco wrote to employees that the companies must defend their content, which they spend millions of dollars a year to produce, from being used without consent or compensation. · Dawn
  6. A spokesperson for Microsoft said in an email that while they are surprised by the lawsuit, they appreciate the importance of local journalism and are happy to explore solutions to the dispute. · Dawn
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
Article provenance · 6 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling

How this piece was made: written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona, at the working desk on Saturday, September 5, 2026. Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.

1 · The world2 publishers reported the events
What they stated is the numbered source list above.
Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read. The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-05T12:28Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)


The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts



4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.


Integrity


Content hash (SHA-256)60f4fdff5162f6d13c47240fa750a45fce1a3da6401925b4464dcf581bd9c280


Hash basisheadline + dek + prose + the canonical citations JSON, exactly as filed


Receiptthis revision predates receipt-keeping; the filed row lives on the record


Machine readablethe full proof, JSON


Verify



A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.


Up next in this editionThree hikers rescued on Mt. Shasta after AI-planned climb fails