Serena Williams and Venus Williams will play doubles together at the U.S. Open for the first time since 2022. [1]
The final score of the match was 6-3 6-7 (8-6) 7-6 (10-7) in favor of Joint and Chan. [2] The Williams sisters were defeated 6-3, 6-7(6), 7-6(10-7) by the 14th-seeded team of Australia's Maya Joint and Taiwan's Chan Hao-Ching. [3][8][10] Aryna Sabalenka defeated Kamilla Rakhimova 6-3, 6-4 to book her place in the fourth round of the US Open. [4]
Carlos Alcaraz defeated China's Wu Yibing 6-3, 6-4, 6-1 to advance to the fourth round of the US Open. [5] The match lasted three hours and two minutes and required a third-set tie-breaker. [6][7] The Williams sisters lost the match in three sets with final scores of 3-6, 7-6, and 6-7. [9]
Serena Williams stated that the decision to return to the U.S. Open doubles was at the suggestion of her daughter. [11]Serena Williams y Venus Williams jugarán juntas en dobles en el Abierto de EE. UU. por primera vez desde 2022. [1]
El marcador final del partido fue 6-3 6-7 (8-6) 7-6 (10-7) a favor de Joint y Chan. [2] Las hermanas Williams fueron derrotadas 6-3, 6-7(6), 7-6(10-7) por el equipo cabeza de serie número 14 de la australiana Maya Joint y la taiwanesa Chan Hao-Ching. [3][8][10] Aryna Sabalenka derrotó a Kamilla Rakhimova 6-3, 6-4 para asegurar su lugar en la cuarta ronda del Abierto de EE. UU. [4]
Carlos Alcaraz derrotó al chino Wu Yibing 6-3, 6-4, 6-1 para avanzar a la cuarta ronda del Abierto de EE. UU. [5] El partido duró tres horas y dos minutos y requirió un desempate en el tercer set. [6][7] Las hermanas Williams perdieron el partido en tres sets con marcadores finales de 3-6, 7-6 y 6-7. [9]
Serena Williams declaró que la decisión de regresar al dobles del Abierto de EE. UU. fue por sugerencia de su hija. [11]
Proof11 sources · 6 publishers
What this stands on
Serena Williams and Venus Williams will play doubles together at the U.S. Open for the first time since 2022. · Winnipeg Free Press
The final score of the match was 6-3 6-7 (8-6) 7-6 (10-7) in favor of Joint and Chan. · Sky Sports
The Williams sisters were defeated 6-3, 6-7(6), 7-6(10-7) by the 14th-seeded team of Australia's Maya Joint and Taiwan's Chan Hao-Ching. · The HinduIndia
Aryna Sabalenka defeated Kamilla Rakhimova 6-3, 6-4 to book her place in the fourth round of the US Open. · Al Jazeera
Carlos Alcaraz defeated China's Wu Yibing 6-3, 6-4, 6-1 to advance to the fourth round of the US Open. · Al Jazeera
The match lasted three hours and two minutes and required a third-set tie-breaker. · Sky Sports
The Williams sisters blew a 5-0 lead in the third-set tie-breaker before losing it 8-6. · Sky Sports
Chan Hao-ching and Maya Joint won the decisive third set tiebreak 10-7 after the Williams sisters led 5-0. · B.T.
The Williams sisters lost the match in three sets with final scores of 3-6, 7-6, and 6-7. · B.T.
Maya Joint and Chan Hao-ching overcame a 5-0 deficit in the first-to-10 tiebreaker to win the third set. · Deadspin
Serena Williams stated that the decision to return to the U.S. Open doubles was at the suggestion of her daughter. · The HinduIndia
The one we could place publishes from India. 5 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Saturday, September 5, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world6 publishers reported the events across 6 source articles
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
The one we could place publishes from India. 5 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
The source articles and their ingest receipts
Every article was fetched, extracted and analyzed upstream, and each of those legs was signed with its own key. This opens the record's own receipts for them.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-05T12:27Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.